| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 18 '18 at 22:48 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.4%
Above average
|
52% 83 Pts
|
28% 222 Pts
|
16% 255 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.5%
Poor
|
21% 29.5 fps
|
25% 29.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 134 124 126 129 120 MB/s
|
75.6%
Very good
|
80% 110 MB/s
|
142% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3320310CS 320GB
186GB free
Firmware: SC14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 78 77 77 78 78 MB/s
|
46.7%
Average
|
53% 72.1 MB/s
|
124% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
333, 333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.7%
Below average
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.33 GB/s
|
52% 76.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $193 |