Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 19:01
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	72%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 71 1-Core 122 2-Core 246 79% 146 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 934 84% 708 Pts	64-Core 1,905 118% 1,905 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.5% Average	Lighting 47.1 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 44.1 38% 48.3 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 47 Splatting 60.3 48% 58.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 402 Write 398 Mixed 345 85% 381 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 39.8 146% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 354 266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 164GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 297 300 303 309 309 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,874 Write 1,463 Mixed 971 SusWrite 478 266% 1,197 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 58.6 220% 86.2 MB/s	DQ Read 954 DQ Write 864 DQ Mixed 916 685% 911 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 232GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 411 406 406 401 401 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 400 Write 399 Mixed 325 SusWrite 410 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 95.3 4K Mixed 37.7 144% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 332 256% 348 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 CMU16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 CMK32GX4M4B3000C15 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 47 MC Mixed 29.7 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 9.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 105%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 112%

UFO

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	51x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	45x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	22x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	18x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	18x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,302

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16