Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 09:50
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 210
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 400
55% 406 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1394) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 97
Reflection 100
Parallax 91.5
79% 96.3 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 88.4
Splatting 77.7
68% 84 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
58GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 236 261 256 258 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 261
Write 288
Mixed 195
SusWrite 254
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 27.6
104% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 186
140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 81%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 452 444 398 243 243 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 936
Write 909
Mixed 913
SusWrite 388
177% 786 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 69.2
235% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 822
617% 827 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 171%
Great: 170%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 367 453 457 458 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 460
Mixed 392
SusWrite 428
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 64.8
204% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 125%
Great: 131%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 110 115 103 102 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 138
Write 181
Mixed 153
SusWrite 109
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 24.2
124% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 158
127% 177 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 66%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
374GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 71 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 73.5
Write 44.3
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 71.3
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
218GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 91.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 101
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $431
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback