Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E LX (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '18 at 00:40
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 92 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 148 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 261 34% 256 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 59.9 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 48.8 49% 56.2 fps	MRender 73.3 Gravity 62.7 Splatting 58.9 52% 65 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 151 110 83 76 77 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.1% Average	Read 212 Write 201 Mixed 211 SusWrite 101 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 30.1 98% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 49.4 41% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 49GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 48 48 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 152 Write 101 Mixed 113 SusWrite 47.7 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 16.9 64% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 55.5 DQ Mixed 23.8 23% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 73%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 64GB 1,117 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 13GB free Firmware: X2306RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 48 48 48 47 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.6% Below average	Read 166 Write 106 Mixed 106 SusWrite 47.4 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 18.5 66% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 53.9 DQ Mixed 23.2 23% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 7GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 215 Write 202 Mixed 186 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 33.5 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 39 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 45.2 39% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB 18,040 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 8GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 17.8 32% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 10GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 19 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 18.3 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 14.6 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	125x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	116x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	89x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	186x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	137x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16