Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 166 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 501 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 612 38% 612 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 290 1,528 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0492) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.0 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.62 Parallax 0.38 1% 0.94 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.09 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 240GB 15,968 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1222A SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 403 394 388 393 393 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 458 Write 394 Mixed 366 SusWrite 397 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 14.3 82% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 87.3 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 24 68% 139 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 4x4GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 33.4 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16