PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z400 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 17 '18 at 04:16 |
Run Duration | 524 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
72.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
106%
Outstanding
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 243 242 240 239 239 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
811GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 60 66 55 55 64 MB/s
|
47.6%
Average
|
|||
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
424GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 10 11 11 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
3GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 8.1 19 80 80 80 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
0GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
||||
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
478GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 2TB
3GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
WD 10EADS External 1TB
650GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1230 6TB
24GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 45 36 37 47 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 4TB
11GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 80 65 64 67 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 4TB
5GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 80 65 65 65 MB/s
|
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 4TB
42GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 78 62 63 63 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
4GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 3TB
125GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 26 27 27 MB/s
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
462GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 1140 3TB
180GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 28 MB/s
|
19%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples | 569x |
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 534x |
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples | 487x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 272x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 155x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 137x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 136x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 73x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $258 |