Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 21:22
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 640
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 113
Parallax 106
91% 110 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 89.4
77% 94.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 303 303 292 288 284 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 466
Mixed 386
SusWrite 320
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 54.8
174% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$40
361GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 421 430 428 422 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 420
Mixed 337
SusWrite 424
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 38
135% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 210
177% 256 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 108%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
218GB free
Firmware: VT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 66 66 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 70
Mixed 46
SusWrite 66.7
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB-$115
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 40
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 22.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback