Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 16:54
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 838
86% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 115
Parallax 104
93% 111 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.3
77% 95.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1458 1511 1517 1488 1552 1274 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,154
Write 1,693
Mixed 805
SusWrite 1,467
342% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 58.4
194% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 683
515% 692 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 267%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 440 437 446 480 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 438
Mixed 409
SusWrite 455
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 53.4
179% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
WDC WD3003FZEX-00Z4SA0 512GB
223GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 368 369 365 368 368 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 461
Write 426
Mixed 336
SusWrite 368
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 42.8
148% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 192
185% 294 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 121%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
749GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 101 99 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 100
Mixed 68
SusWrite 99.8
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 83%
USB 3.0 Drobo S - Gen 2 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 000a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 41 48 35 54 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 70.3
Write 71.8
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 44.6
73% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.8
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback