Asrock H77M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120306
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 11:02
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 181
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 346
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 67
Parallax 82.3
52% 71 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 63.9
Splatting 54.3
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10362
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 75 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 248
Write 90
Mixed 117
SusWrite 66.3
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 19.1
68% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 61
54% 83.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 45%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
332GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 67 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 56
Mixed 52
SusWrite 67.1
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
242GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 70 69 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 69.8
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $571
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback