Clevo X7200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemClevo X7200  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO X7200
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20101015
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 04:12
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 975-$550
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 111
59% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 143
17% 133 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Clevo(1558 7200) 1.5GB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
978GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 207 218 221 215 221 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 245
Write 212
Mixed 210
SusWrite 215
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 26.6
87% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 182
135% 177 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 58%
Great: 105%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 207 219 220 212 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.8% Good
Read 212
Write 185
Mixed 215
SusWrite 214
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 31.7
105% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 177
136% 185 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 133%
Asmt 2115 2TB
572GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 24.3
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 27
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
919GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 92 98 100 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 59.7
Write 110
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 98.6
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
161% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 19.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X7200 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo X7200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback