Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Jpsacouto Intel powered classmate PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel powered classmate PC
Memory	0.3 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090618
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '18 at 03:23
Run Duration	307 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N270 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 95 1-Core 6.8 2-Core 11.1 34% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 9.9 8-Core 11.1 1% 10.5 Pts	64-Core 9.5 1% 9.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HS040HB 40GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: NK100-05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 6.7 10 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	5.58% Terrible	Read 5.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 7 SusWrite 13.9 6% 8.23 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.58% Great: 15%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	0.37% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.68 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.37% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x63.8GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4 of 4 slots used 255GB DIMM DDR Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 0 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 57.2 70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 9%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16