Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 00:43
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 233
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 854
76% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,394
86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.4% Very good
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 121
Parallax 168
58% 120 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 186
Splatting 129
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 Pro 512GB-$79
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0201B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 389 397 394 398 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 421
Write 398
Mixed 380
SusWrite 394
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 34.3
122% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 28.9
82% 175 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 120%
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: M0MU031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 406 413 408 411 287 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 148
Write 420
Mixed 344
SusWrite 388
74% 325 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 32
107% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 24
85% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 101%
TEAML5Lite3D1T 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 407 407 394 398 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 430
Write 396
Mixed 348
SusWrite 402
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 34.7
113% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 106
125% 217 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 125%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 121 121 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 121
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 27
MC Write 46.6
MC Mixed 27
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 9.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback