Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99X Killer (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '18 at 19:58
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 84.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 244 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 811 76% 629 Pts	64-Core 991 61% 991 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4995) CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 113 Parallax 102 88% 108 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 101 Splatting 88.7 77% 94.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 777 736 646 584 545 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 2,010 Write 856 Mixed 643 SusWrite 683 231% 1,048 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 47.6 203% 77.4 MB/s	DQ Read 695 DQ Write 203 DQ Mixed 257 240% 385 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 243%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 179 183 187 179 188 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 563 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 009f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.6 5.4 6 5 5.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 23 Write 1.5 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.3 9% 8.77 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x8GB 1,486 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 38.7 MC Write 47.5 MC Mixed 38.2 118% 41.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 19.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	146x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	42x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	19x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	18x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GBUnknownBench 96%, 5,257 samples	12x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	9x
DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 829 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $923

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16