| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 10% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | Toshiba Satellite P755 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PEQAA |
| Memory | 4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121030 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 15 '18 at 17:37 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
| CPU Throttled | 10% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.5%
Below average
|
30% 40.7 Pts
|
12% 92.8 Pts
|
7% 109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FC30) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3223
|
1.11%
Terrible
|
1% 1.33 fps
|
1% 1.55 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 256 73 56 37 36 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
60% 265 MB/s
|
64% 21.5 MB/s
|
25% 53.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
|
35.8%
Below average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite P755 Builds (Compare 207 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite P755
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples | 90x |
| Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples | 53x |
| Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples | 18x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 154x |
| GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples | 40x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $228 |