Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Memory 33.1 1-Core 42.1 2-Core 82.3 30% 52.5 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 149 21% 154 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6194 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.21 fps	MRender 1.05 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.09 1% 1.01 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 282 291 293 291 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 395 Write 374 Mixed 379 SusWrite 287 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 39.7 128% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 185 148% 208 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x4GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.37 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16