Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '18 at 08:18
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 81.8 1-Core 140 2-Core 281 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 543 8-Core 1,119 98% 831 Pts	64-Core 1,558 96% 1,558 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2884) 3GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 47% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,195 Write 5,734 Mixed 5605 1,304% 5,845 MB/s	4K Read 503 4K Write 254 4K Mixed 328 1,318% 362 MB/s	DQ Read 1,097 DQ Write 789 DQ Mixed 862 666% 916 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 381GB free Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 491 491 491 391 291 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 485 Mixed 459 SusWrite 441 107% 475 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 60.8 205% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 358 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 129%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB 340 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1TB free Firmware: AN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 169 169 169 163 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 154 Mixed 98.9 SusWrite 167 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000VN0001-1SF174 2TB 340 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 1.5TB free Firmware: AN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 188 188 191 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 182 Mixed 99.9 SusWrite 188 123% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB 504 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 57.5 MC Mixed 33 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 12.1 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16