User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '18 at 19:25
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 224
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 579
62% 493 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.62% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 7.84
6% 9.02 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 7.13
Splatting 15.7
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 793 623 622 625 625 618 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,069
Write 932
Mixed 653
SusWrite 651
185% 826 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 35.5
132% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 977
749% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 169%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 24
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 25.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback