Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '18 at 17:11
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.7% Average
Memory 45.2
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 66.7
28% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 429
38% 322 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.46
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 70.1
46% 62.6 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 68.3
55% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 256 279 273 278 283 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 438
Write 407
Mixed 332
SusWrite 277
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 30.6
103% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 320
237% 313 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 124%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
109GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 96 88 93 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43% Average
Read 184
Write 141
Mixed 153
SusWrite 91.4
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 21.2
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 112
90% 125 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 156 160 158 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 151
Write 117
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 155
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 113%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 105 109 107 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 71
SusWrite 100
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
496GB free
Firmware: HP23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 100 95 100 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 98.6
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 21.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $759
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback