PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20110406 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '18 at 17:23 |
Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G850-$118
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATI Radeon HD 4600 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.1)
XFX(1682 2932) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.93.7.0
|
4.54%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA9DA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 46 49 49 45 49 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 135x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 93x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 57x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 25x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $292 |