| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG RF510/RF410/RF710 |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110303 |
| Uptime | 1.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 13 '18 at 14:51 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
44.3%
Average
|
45% 72 Pts
|
20% 151 Pts
|
10% 162 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Sanyo(144D C08E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.2
|
2.88%
Terrible
|
3% 3.27 fps
|
3% 4.07 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 164 161 187 163 160 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
41% 182 MB/s
|
46% 15.7 MB/s
|
112% 157 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
|
23.1%
Poor
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
16% 5.6 GB/s
|
34% 117 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical RF510/RF410/RF710 Builds (Compare 69 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung RF510/RF410/RF710
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples | 30x |
| Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples | 26x |
| Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $248 |