Paradigit P5Q-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemParadigit P5Q-PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5Q-PRO
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090223
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 12:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 68.6
37% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 136
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
MSI(1462 2308) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 3.31
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 2.87
3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 90 45 38 45 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.2% Poor
Read 129
Write 76
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 66.6
19% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 8.7
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 9.3
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 10
8% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback