PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-PH67A-UD3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110128 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 13 '18 at 12:30 |
Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
62.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 83 37 23 31 32 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
215GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 103 103 103 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
ASMT 2115 1TB
447GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 80 77 87 74 69 MB/s
|
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Maxtor OneTouch 320GB
176GB free, PID 7350
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
|
41.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 6x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 5x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $356 |