Gateway M-7305U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGateway M-7305U  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '18 at 10:37
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
uFCPGA2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 20
2-Core 36.9
30% 40.2 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 33.7
5% 34.8 Pts
64-Core 31.9
2% 31.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Gateway(107B 0390)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.28% Terrible
Lighting 0.37
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.3 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.22
0% 0.29 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.28%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 20 42 40 44 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 49.7
Write 48
Mixed 32
SusWrite 37.5
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.98% Terrible
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback