Asus H110M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 23:39
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 212
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1175 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 34.2
23% 31.4 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 32.5
24% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 295 298 302 300 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 376
Mixed 372
SusWrite 300
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 56.6
190% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 59.6
95% 189 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
30GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 139 137 143 140 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 414
Mixed 350
SusWrite 156
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 47
174% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 174
180% 294 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 108%
iXpand Flash Drive 128GB
119GB free, PID cffa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 25 26 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 87
Write 73.3
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 25.9
81% 63 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.5
236% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 23.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $542
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback