Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive470% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 21:12
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 762
78% 630 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2919 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 208
Parallax 185
155% 194 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 185
Splatting 128
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1496 1531 1573 1613 1699 1727 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
470% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 1,774
Mixed 1,963
SusWrite 1,607
422% 1,877 MB/s
4K Read 234
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 214
738% 218 MB/s
DQ Read 1,411
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,212
927% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 470%
Great: 541%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
454GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 460 463 468 465 465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 458
Mixed 423
SusWrite 462
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 48.5
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 68.7
235% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
343GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 490 490 490 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 474
Mixed 424
SusWrite 490
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 68.6
235% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
273GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 490 490 489 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 465
Mixed 417
SusWrite 490
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 70.4
240% 86.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 141%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
275GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1974 1958 1908 1908 1905 1906 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2464
Write 1,915
Mixed 930
SusWrite 1,927
404% 1,809 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 76
268% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 1,136
886% 1,219 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 355%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 35.3
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 34.2
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,155
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback