bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 19:35
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3 550-$90
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.7% Below average
SC Int 72.4
SC Float 75.4
SC Mixed 74.2
59% 74 Pts
QC Int 144
QC Float 138
QC Mixed 156
33% 146 Pts
MC Int 178
MC Float 199
MC Mixed 195
29% 191 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 11
4% 11.5 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 14.2
5% 11.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$38
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 88 52 61 55 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 223
Write 207
Mixed 172
SusWrite 76.5
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 26.6
82% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 62.5
DQ Mixed 32.2
28% 40 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$20
183GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 85.8
Write 12.2
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 12.7
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.5 8.1 8.9 8.6 8.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7.62% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 9.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 8.3
14% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 2.9
124% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 0x393955353435382D3030322E4130304C4620 0x0198 0x393930353437312D3030312E4130304C4620 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 12.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $383
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i7-7700K $300AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $162
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $74G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback