Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$160 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U22, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	35% Below average	Memory 60.6 1-Core 37.2 2-Core 56 35% 51.3 Pts	4-Core 55.7 8-Core 68.2 8% 61.9 Pts	64-Core 73.1 4% 73.1 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX 100 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Clevo(1558 0481) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 260.99 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	5.48% Terrible	Lighting 7.4 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 3.09 6% 5.78 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 5.87 Splatting 4.52 4% 5.53 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.48% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 176 80 44 38 37 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.6% Average	Read 181 Write 179 Mixed 164 SusWrite 92.7 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 26.1 89% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 123 101% 145 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 4.4 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16