| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP 870-134ng (all builds) |
| Motherboard | HP 828A |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 17:49 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.4%
Good
|
71% 122 Pts
|
42% 321 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
HP(103C 82DF) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.3%
Poor
|
24% 29.1 fps
|
25% 30.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 127 111 94 87 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
49% 224 MB/s
|
115% 42.9 MB/s
|
151% 228 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
839GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 90 90 90 91 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
82% 113 MB/s
|
238% 1.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.9%
Good
|
66% 23.1 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
51% 78.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 870-134ng Builds (Compare 6 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP 870-134ng
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 3x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $179 |