MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GP62M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 15:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
67.5% Good
SC Int 90.9
SC Float 90.3
SC Mixed 94.3
74% 91.8 Pts
QC Int 331
QC Float 379
QC Mixed 348
80% 353 Pts
MC Int 324
MC Float 372
MC Mixed 349
52% 348 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-00000 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 84 80 81 77 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 298
Mixed 377
SusWrite 95.4
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 53.1
184% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 312
213% 253 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 111%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
142GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 118 118 119 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 98.8
Write 101
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 117
61% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 5,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $83
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $115
Intel Core i5-8600K $249AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $134
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $167SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback