Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130407
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '18 at 14:53
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 71.8 2-Core 160 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 304 42% 311 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53% Above average	Lighting 65.6 Reflection 72.5 Parallax 64 54% 67.4 fps	MRender 73.5 Gravity 63.1 Splatting 57.4 52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99 7,913 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 271 279 277 277 275 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 474 Mixed 348 SusWrite 289 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 47.6 169% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 229 196% 289 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB 10,689 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 16GB free Firmware: 10.02E02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 26 28 26 25 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 50 Write 48.5 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 29.2 31% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 35%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 36GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 82 83 81 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 71.2 Write 74.3 Mixed 51 SusWrite 82 51% 69.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 58%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 831GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 102 100 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 93 Write 94 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 101 116% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.8% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 19.5 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 18 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	131x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	96x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	58x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	57x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16