Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-105 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-105
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140113
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '18 at 14:33
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135 7,219 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 120 54% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 196 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E248) 2GB CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 990 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.56% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 9.75 7% 8.86 fps	MRender 7.86 Gravity 6.87 Splatting 8.74 6% 7.82 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 871GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 132 150 144 151 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 104 Write 146 Mixed 63 SusWrite 146 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 109%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 82 Write 26 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 18.2 43% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 49% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 58%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB 5,016 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 19.2 Mixed 4.2 10% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 37,489 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

CPU
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	54x
A8-6500 APUAMD $135Bench 50%, 7,219 samples	7x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8670DAMDBench 5%, 5,822 samples	14x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	5x
HD 7470AMDBench 2%, 14,835 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 480GBSpccBench 81%, 3,502 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	2x

RAM
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 3x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 236 samples	6x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	6x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 556 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16