Acer Aspire TC-105

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 days ago, 3 days ago.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-105  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-105
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 14:33
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43% Average
SC Int 74
SC Float 65.9
SC Mixed 69.6
56% 69.8 Pts
QC Int 214
QC Float 170
QC Mixed 206
45% 197 Pts
MC Int 224
MC Float 190
MC Mixed 215
32% 210 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 240
Sapphire(174B E248) 2GB
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 990 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 31.2
8% 26.1 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 20.1
8% 19.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$43
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 132 150 144 151 161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 104
Write 146
Mixed 63
SusWrite 146
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 108%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 82
Write 26
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 18.2
43% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 33%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 19.2
Mixed 4.2
10% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 35%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Aspire TC-105 Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Acer Aspire TC-105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $230
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback