Monster TULPAR T5 V10.1

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V10.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V10.1
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170206
Uptime	15.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '18 at 11:20
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.3% Excellent	Memory 89.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 168 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 544 60% 471 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 65A1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	6.75% Terrible	Lighting 6.87 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 7.12 6% 9.79 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 6.57 Splatting 14.6 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.75% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 302 315 315 308 316 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,645 Write 1,043 Mixed 653 SusWrite 336 203% 919 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 60.6 208% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,044 DQ Write 876 DQ Mixed 885 683% 935 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 127 129 128 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 116 Write 132 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 127 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 4,823 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 21.7 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V10.1 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V10.1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	6x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	5x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	3x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	2x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	1x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16