| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P65 (all builds) |
| Memory | 19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170407 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 12 '18 at 11:00 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
71.3%
Very good
|
68% 117 Pts
|
56% 459 Pts
|
35% 567 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1650) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
|
6.39%
Terrible
|
5% 27.3 fps
|
8% 9.77 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend MTS800 M.2 512GB-$265
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 216 72 43 47 46 MB/s
|
68.9%
Good
|
70% 313 MB/s
|
102% 38 MB/s
|
162% 236 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB Kingston CBD24D4S7D8MB-16 24GB
2133, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
|
65.2%
Good
|
67% 23.5 GB/s
|
52% 18.4 GB/s
|
46% 87.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-P65 Builds (Compare 114 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P65
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 64x |
| GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples | 49x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $140 |