Asus M51BC

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus M51BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M51BC
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '18 at 10:37
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 56.1 2-Core 123 57% 89.9 Pts	4-Core 203 8-Core 291 31% 247 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 83F8) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	28.7% Poor	Lighting 33.4 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 42 27% 36.2 fps	MRender 46.1 Gravity 38 Splatting 33.7 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 52 55 55 56 52 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 158 Write 82.8 Mixed 83.3 SusWrite 83.5 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 9.4 42% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 15.7 DQ Write 18 DQ Mixed 16.3 12% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 85%
Hitachi HTS723225A7A364 250GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 232GB free Firmware: ECBOA70D SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 104 103 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 98.3 Write 98.3 Mixed 58 SusWrite 104 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.3% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 14.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M51BC Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M51BC

CPU
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	97x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	11x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	4x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	16x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	12x
Radeon R9 255AMDBench 8%, 591 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	13x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 1,209 samples	7x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16