User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardHUAWEI KPL-W0X
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 12 '18 at 06:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.4% Above average
SC Int 90.1
SC Float 104
SC Mixed 85.8
75% 93.3 Pts
QC Int 47.4
QC Float 306
QC Mixed 280
47% 211 Pts
MC Int 472
MC Float 452
MC Mixed 434
68% 453 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Mobile Graphics
Device(19E5 3E06) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 45.3
12% 37 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 28.9
Splatting 33.1
12% 28.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 14%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1027 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6102027
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 202 201 206 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 429
Write 260
Mixed 197
SusWrite 201
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 27.2
92% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 194
150% 205 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 21
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 12.4
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 68%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $413Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $175Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback