Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 22:52
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$300
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
SC Int 139
SC Float 148
SC Mixed 143
115% 144 Pts
QC Int 538
QC Float 552
QC Mixed 541
123% 544 Pts
MC Int 717
MC Float 805
MC Mixed 775
114% 766 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$410
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 329
Reflection 303
Parallax 314
100% 315 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 302
Splatting 237
106% 249 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$194
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,851
Write 1,378
Mixed 586
280% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 58.4
260% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,083
823% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 257%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$245
14GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 346
Write 334
Mixed 250
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 40.6
150% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 342
249% 322 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 98%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$170
297GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 93.3
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 90.5
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$170
688GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49% Average
Read 94
Write 90.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 76.8
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49%
Great: 57%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
536GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 104 104 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 88
Write 67
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 103
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$12
29GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 12 28 28 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 140
Write 25.5
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 24.9
55% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.6
134% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 39%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 128GB
102GB free, PID 0326
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 90
Write 45.5
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 47.6
68% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.5
262% 5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$150
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
67.6% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 18.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 2,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $1,137
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $289Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $235AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $176SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback