Asus FX503VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus FX503VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX503VD
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '18 at 17:50
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 226
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 573
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B90) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 31.1
27% 29.8 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.1
24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 708 712 730 725 740 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 840
Mixed 600
SusWrite 721
188% 842 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52.4
179% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 852
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 591
489% 706 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 182%
Great: 215%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
190GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 441 456 437 456 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 399
Mixed 397
SusWrite 416
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 42.1
120% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX503VD Builds (Compare 1,127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus FX503VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback