Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 59.3 2-Core 109 52% 82.4 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 226 26% 201 Pts	64-Core 241 15% 241 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6251) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 26 Parallax 34.2 30% 32.3 fps	MRender 35.2 Gravity 35.5 Splatting 31.2 28% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,591 Write 30.7 Mixed 55.5 116% 559 MB/s	4K Read 216 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4.1 334% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 79GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 42 46 48 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 57.7 Write 61.7 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 44.6 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 11.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $484

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16