Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 21:00
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 719
76% 606 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 59.2
56% 65 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 65
55% 67 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 295 294 295 296 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 297
Mixed 289
SusWrite 294
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 41.9
172% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 41.7
109% 232 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
880GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 82 79 75 75 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 51
Write 86.3
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 73.2
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 113%
SMI USB disk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.8 8.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Read 29.5
Write 0.3
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 8.3
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback