Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics87.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 19:02
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 92.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 866
87% 708 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Zotac(19DA 1396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Lighting 114
Reflection 113
Parallax 103
92% 110 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 88.3
77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1593 1390 1595 1602 1597 1581 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,159
Write 1,811
Mixed 800
SusWrite 1,560
354% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.1
204% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 736
554% 743 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 278%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470
1.5TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 430 475 476 477 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 484
Mixed 434
SusWrite 469
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 57.4
191% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
WDC WD3003FZEX-00Z4SA0 512GB
224GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 477 477 448 401 394 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 504
Write 477
Mixed 344
SusWrite 446
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 44.4
153% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 189
185% 295 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 121%
Sandisk CFast SDDR-299 64GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 83 89 95 93 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 350
Write 148
Mixed 74
SusWrite 87
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 11.6
39% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 53%
USB 3.0 Drobo S - Gen 2 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 000a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 61 57 42 44 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
29% Poor
Read 40.2
Write 22
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 53.6
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.2
136% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback