| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160617 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 10 '18 at 07:49 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
59% 95.7 Pts
|
36% 290 Pts
|
24% 387 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
1.92%
Terrible
|
2% 2.43 fps
|
2% 2.29 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
P3-256 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T170
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 422 399 369 372 335 MB/s
|
84.7%
Excellent
|
96% 425 MB/s
|
113% 40.1 MB/s
|
104% 150 MB/s
|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
112GB free
Firmware: 603A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 94 97 97 94 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
119% 42.9 MB/s
|
78% 106 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
323GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 138 141 145 143 142 MB/s
|
83.4%
Excellent
|
78% 108 MB/s
|
127% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.2%
Average
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
56% 71.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 289x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 228x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 70x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 51x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 47x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |