PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H270 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170515 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 10 '18 at 07:45 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
87%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 291 256 250 250 249 MB/s
|
109%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
537GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 106 107 109 113 111 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 103x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 93x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 73x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 60x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 38x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $679 |