PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970-Gaming SLI-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160128 |
Uptime | 17.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 10 '18 at 04:35 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.2
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 305 307 307 309 313 MB/s
|
90.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 70 78 39 64 58 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1866 CL10 Ser 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 41x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 17x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 7x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 7x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $305 |