Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5300B APU 2,157 User benchmarks, average bench 39% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	48.2% Average	Memory 81 1-Core 48.4 2-Core 93.7 49% 74.4 Pts	4-Core 92.8 8-Core 93.2 12% 93 Pts	64-Core 89.4 6% 89.4 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D 8,289 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 1850) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.45% Terrible	Lighting 2.77 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 2.22 2% 3.01 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 4.39 3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.45% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 95 46 44 41 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 345 Write 260 Mixed 279 SusWrite 65.6 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 30.9 105% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 131 105% 148 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 91%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E635 500GB 268 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 237GB free Firmware: GH2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 72.7 Write 76.3 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 73.9 44% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
H M 8 8GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 78.7 51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	6x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $25

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16