Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive475% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 04:10
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 758
78% 626 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2919 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 208
Parallax 204
158% 202 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 185
Splatting 133
122% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1507 1515 1575 1604 1605 1593 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 2181
Write 1,760
Mixed 1,950
SusWrite 1,567
419% 1,864 MB/s
4K Read 244
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 216
755% 222 MB/s
DQ Read 1,455
DQ Write 1,184
DQ Mixed 1,281
970% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 475%
Great: 541%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
454GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 459 464 468 467 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 472
Mixed 424
SusWrite 463
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 68.9
236% 85.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
343GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 489 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 467
Mixed 416
SusWrite 490
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 68.5
236% 86.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
273GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 489 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 468
Mixed 418
SusWrite 490
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 70.8
241% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 141%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
276GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1992 1992 1958 1907 1910 1903 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 1,946
Mixed 932
SusWrite 1,944
404% 1,807 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 75.7
267% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 1,270
DQ Mixed 1,142
899% 1,242 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 355%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 35.2
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 34.4
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback