Gigabyte GA-Q87M-D2H

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Q87M-D2H (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '16 at 00:09
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 107 2-Core 211 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 424 56% 423 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 6.46 Parallax 6.09 3% 5.46 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 7.26 4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: 526ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 21369981 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 68942815044824 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1777 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 469 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 75 77314326561 (C2) HDA temperature 33 75 77314326561 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21369981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21369981 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21369981 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 23560 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9056 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9056 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24770	61% Good	Read 479 Write 207 Mixed 266 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 16.4 66% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 72.8 90% 162 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 94%
WD WD1002F9YZ-09H1J 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 232GB free Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 170 2325 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 954 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5494 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 784 (10) Unknown 11 189 195152900330 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 195 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 758 (C2) HDA temperature 102 94 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 11 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.2% Above average	Read 110 Write 96.3 Mixed 84 72% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.17 72% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AAKS-00A7B 500GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 108GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 27 (03) Spinup time 160 153 4975 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8123 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 29105 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4754 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1406 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8122 (C2) HDA temperature 105 86 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.3% Below average	Read 57.2 Write 55 Mixed 55 42% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.37 94% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 2x8GB 2,479 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Q87M-D2H Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q87M-D2H

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	74x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	52x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	38x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	34x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x

RAM
M378B5273EB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 61%, 430 samples	9x
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G 16GBKingstonBench 53%, 358 samples	6x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16