Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H170M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 01:49
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 99.4
1-Core 89
2-Core 139
69% 109 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 223
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 41.5
38% 44.9 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 43
Splatting 38.4
33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 255 260 255 244 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 451
Write 242
Mixed 193
SusWrite 247
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 34.5
130% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 122
126% 207 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
364GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 396 464 440 440 478 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 455
Mixed 403
SusWrite 426
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 48.8
180% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 356
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
10GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 51 55 54 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 42.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 47.3
60% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.1% Good
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 39
102% 39 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H170M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $411
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback