Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Performance  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 21:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 124
61% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 142
24% 169 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3006) 3GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1662 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.7% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 58.3
38% 45.3 fps
MRender 30.1
Gravity 45.8
Splatting 38.7
32% 38.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 283 231 164 143 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 379
Write 310
Mixed 244
SusWrite 202
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 28.5
98% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 38.4
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 48
46% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 119%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
114GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 96 96 95 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 89.8
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 96.3
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 2TB
308GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 34.7
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 37.5
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $819
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback