Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 20:01
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 234
89% 155 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 785
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 781
48% 781 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 30.4
22% 27.7 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 28.6
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 127 122 120 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 374
Write 140
Mixed 186
SusWrite 120
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 41.7
166% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 106
94% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 79%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
161GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 89 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 80
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 89.3
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51%
Great: 65%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
313GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 74 73 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 72.8
71% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
133GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 55 56 53 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 80.8
Write 74.8
Mixed 52
SusWrite 55.9
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 29.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 29.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 49.8
80% 49.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback