Asrock H370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H370M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '18 at 13:13
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.6% Outstanding	Memory 95.2 1-Core 137 2-Core 274 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 548 8-Core 874 87% 711 Pts	64-Core 1,032 64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 3658) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 16 Parallax 16.8 16% 17.5 fps	MRender 22.9 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 16.7 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 103 107 108 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 150 Write 148 Mixed 67 SusWrite 103 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 108%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 627GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 94 96 98 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 100 Write 98.5 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 96.2 64% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 22 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 26.7 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 56.5 71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H370M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	45x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	37x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	31x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	14x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	9x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $249

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16